Complete step-by-step execution guide — from board endorsement through bill signing and implementation
The Idaho Nursing Facility Sustainability & Quality Act is a comprehensive Medicaid reimbursement reform bill designed to modernize Idaho's nursing facility payment system, unlock over $32 million in federal matching funds, and establish a quality-driven rate framework — all at a net state cost of approximately $5.3 million ($2.80 per Idaho resident per year).
Idaho currently ranks 46th nationally in Medicaid nursing facility reimbursement at $259/day. The Act proposes raising the existing provider assessment from 3.5% to 5.5% — still below the federal 6% safe harbor — to generate the state match needed to draw down federal funds that Idaho currently leaves on the table. Six core reforms are enacted over a 3-year phase-in: a modern rate formula, federal fund optimization, quality bonuses, a rate floor, a workforce development fund, and enhanced transparency reporting.
This playbook covers nine phases spanning August 2026 through July 2027:
Execution is led by the Idaho Health Care Association (IHCA) under Executive Director Robert Vande Merwe, with critical strategic support and financial backing from Cascadia Healthcare (CEO Owen Hammond). IHCA staff — Policy Director Luke Malek, Government Affairs Director Lindsay Likes, and Member Services Director Dana Leavitt — serve as the operational engine. The full IHCA Board of Directors, led by President Riley Sessions, provides governance and statewide member activation. All supporting materials are hosted at medicaid-panel-study.vercel.app.
The complete path from strategic preparation through implementation, with key actions at each phase.
Detailed action items from August 2026 through July 2027. Check boxes to track completion.
| Date | Action | Responsible | Deliverable | ✓ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1: Foundation — August–September 2026 | ||||
| Aug 19–23 | Finalize bill draft language and fiscal impact analysis | Luke Malek | Final bill draft (v1.0) | |
| Aug 19–23 | Prepare IHCA board presentation package | Robert Vande Merwe | Board presentation deck | |
| Aug 25–29 | Owen approves Cascadia financial commitment to campaign | Owen Hammond | Budget authorization | |
| Aug 25–29 | Steve models assessment impact on all Cascadia facilities | Steve (CFO) | Cascadia facility impact model | |
| Sep 1–5 | IHCA Board meeting — endorsement resolution vote | Riley Sessions, Robert Vande Merwe | Signed endorsement resolution | |
| Sep 1–5 | Breanna presents financial overview to board | Breanna Jamison | Financial summary presentation | |
| Sep 8–12 | Draft and send formal DHW meeting request letter | Robert Vande Merwe | Signed letter to DHW Director | |
| Sep 8–12 | Begin sponsor identification — Luke contacts former legislative colleagues | Luke Malek | Target sponsor list (3-5 names) | |
| Sep 15–19 | Owen begins personal outreach to Governor Little's office | Owen Hammond | Governor's office initial contact | |
| Sep 15–19 | Lindsay begins coalition outreach — contact AARP Idaho, IHA | Lindsay Likes | Initial coalition contact log | |
| Sep 22–26 | DHW Director meeting — present concept and data | Robert Vande Merwe, Luke Malek | DHW meeting notes & follow-up items | |
| Sep 22–30 | Lead sponsor confirmed and committed | Luke Malek | Sponsor commitment letter/confirmation | |
| Phase 2: Build Support — October–November 2026 | ||||
| Oct 1–10 | Draft and send CMS Region 10 pre-consultation request | Robert Vande Merwe | CMS meeting request letter | |
| Oct 1–10 | Commission independent economic study (RFP to consulting firms) | Robert Vande Merwe, Steve (CFO) | Signed consulting engagement | |
| Oct 6–17 | Coalition outreach: IMA, Commission on Aging, AAAs, Council on DD | Lindsay Likes | Coalition briefing meetings completed | |
| Oct 13–17 | CMS Region 10 pre-consultation meeting (Seattle) | Robert Vande Merwe, Luke Malek | CMS feedback summary | |
| Oct 20–31 | Recruit co-sponsors — target 3-5 bipartisan legislators | Luke Malek, Lindsay Likes | Co-sponsor commitment list | |
| Oct 20–31 | Collect first round of coalition support letters | Lindsay Likes | Signed coalition letters (batch 1) | |
| Nov 1–7 | Interim Health & Welfare Committee presentation | Robert Vande Merwe, Luke Malek | Committee presentation & handouts | |
| Nov 1–14 | Division of Financial Management briefing | Robert Vande Merwe | DFM briefing memo & fiscal model | |
| Nov 10–14 | Jordan coordinates with Tiffany Pettit on northern Idaho grassroots | Jordan Monson | Northern ID activation plan | |
| Nov 15–21 | Federal safe harbor compliance documentation complete | Luke Malek | Compliance memo | |
| Nov 15–28 | Independent economic study — preliminary results review | Robert Vande Merwe, Steve (CFO) | Draft study findings | |
| Nov 17–28 | Tim coordinates with Chase on Cascadia facility grassroots engagement | Tim Nelson, Chase Gunderson | Facility engagement plan | |
| Nov 24–28 | Tribal consultation preparation — identify contacts for 5 Idaho tribes | Lindsay Likes, Luke Malek | Tribal consultation plan | |
| Phase 3: Pre-Session — December 2026 | ||||
| Dec 1–5 | Submit final bill draft to Legislative Services Office (LSO) | Luke Malek (via sponsor) | LSO drafting request filed | |
| Dec 1–5 | Independent economic study — final report received | Robert Vande Merwe | Final economic study report | |
| Dec 1–12 | UPL analysis coordination with Medicaid consulting firm | Luke Malek | UPL analysis report | |
| Dec 8–12 | JFAC fiscal briefing preparation — complete materials package | Robert Vande Merwe, Steve (CFO) | JFAC briefing binder | |
| Dec 8–12 | Finalize media strategy — op-ed drafted, press release template ready | Robert Vande Merwe, Lindsay Likes | Media kit (op-ed, press release, talking points) | |
| Dec 8–19 | Editorial board meetings with Idaho Statesman, other outlets | Lindsay Likes, Robert Vande Merwe | Editorial meetings completed | |
| Dec 15–19 | Dana distributes grassroots activation kit to all 80+ member facilities | Dana Leavitt | Kit distributed, receipt confirmed | |
| Dec 15–19 | Governor's office advance briefing | Owen Hammond, Robert Vande Merwe, Riley Sessions | Governor briefing notes | |
| Dec 22–31 | All coalition support letters collected | Lindsay Likes | Complete coalition letter package | |
| Dec 22–31 | Grassroots letter-writing campaign launch (holiday recess push) | Dana Leavitt, Tim Nelson | First wave of constituent letters | |
| Phase 4: Session Opens — January 2027 | ||||
| Jan 6–9 | Idaho Legislature convenes — session opens | All | — | |
| Jan 13–17 | Formal bill introduction — H.B. ____ filed | Lead Sponsor, Luke Malek | Bill number assigned | |
| Jan 13–17 | Press release issued; media availability for Robert & Riley | Lindsay Likes, Robert Vande Merwe | Press release distributed | |
| Jan 13–17 | Robert publishes op-ed in Idaho Statesman | Robert Vande Merwe | Published op-ed | |
| Jan 20–24 | Committee hearing preparation — finalize witness list and testimony | Luke Malek, Lindsay Likes | Witness list, testimony scripts | |
| Jan 20–24 | JFAC fiscal note response preparation | Robert Vande Merwe, Steve (CFO) | Fiscal note response memo | |
| Jan 20–31 | Legislative vote counting begins — track supporters/opponents | Lindsay Likes | Vote count tracker (updated weekly) | |
| Jan 20–31 | Identify and prepare CNA, family, and administrator testimony witnesses | Tim Nelson, Dana Leavitt, Breanna Jamison | Confirmed witnesses with prepared testimony | |
| Phase 5: Committee — February 2027 | ||||
| Feb 2–6 | House Health & Welfare Committee hearing | Robert (lead testimony), Luke (policy), witnesses | Testimony delivered | |
| Feb 2–6 | Luke drafts real-time responses to committee questions | Luke Malek | Committee Q&A responses | |
| Feb 9–13 | Committee vote — secure "do pass" recommendation | Lindsay Likes (whip count), All | Committee vote result | |
| Feb 9–13 | Post-committee media push — results & next steps | Lindsay Likes, Robert Vande Merwe | Post-hearing press statement | |
| Phase 6: Floor & Crossover — February–March 2027 | ||||
| Feb 16–20 | Full House floor debate and vote | Lead Sponsor, Luke Malek, Lindsay Likes | House vote result | |
| Feb 23–27 | Bill crosses to Senate — assigned to Senate H&W Committee | Lindsay Likes | Senate committee assignment | |
| Mar 2–6 | Senate Health & Welfare Committee hearing | Robert (testimony), Luke (policy), witnesses | Senate testimony delivered | |
| Mar 9–13 | Senate committee vote & floor vote | All | Senate vote result | |
| Mar 9–20 | Conference committee (if needed for amendment reconciliation) | Luke Malek | Conference report | |
| Phase 7: Governor — March 2027 | ||||
| Mar 16–20 | Enrolled bill transmitted to Governor Little | Lindsay Likes | Enrolled bill | |
| Mar 20–27 | Governor signs bill into law | Owen Hammond, Robert Vande Merwe, Riley Sessions | Signed law / bill signing ceremony | |
| Mar 20–27 | Press release: bill signing announcement | Lindsay Likes | Signing press release | |
| Phase 8: Post-Passage — April–June 2027 | ||||
| Apr 1–15 | DHW begins State Plan Amendment (SPA) preparation | Robert Vande Merwe, Luke Malek (advisory) | SPA draft initiated | |
| Apr 1–30 | IDAPA 16.03.10 negotiated rulemaking initiated | Luke Malek (IHCA representative) | Rulemaking notice published | |
| Apr 15–30 | Provider assessment collection mechanism design | Steve (CFO), Robert Vande Merwe | Assessment collection framework | |
| May 1–31 | Quality metrics program design finalized | Robert Vande Merwe, IHCA Board | Quality program design document | |
| May 1–31 | Workforce fund implementation planning | Dana Leavitt | Workforce fund implementation plan | |
| Jun 1–15 | DHW submits SPA to CMS | DHW (IHCA advisory support) | SPA submitted to CMS | |
| Jun 15–30 | Provider readiness communications — rate change guidance to facilities | Dana Leavitt | Provider readiness bulletin | |
| Phase 9: Effective Date — July 1, 2027 | ||||
| Jul 1 | Phase 1 of rate reforms takes effect | All | New rates in effect | |
| Jul 1–15 | Monitor first enhanced federal draw | Steve (CFO), Robert Vande Merwe | First federal payment verification | |
| Jul 1–31 | Quality reporting requirements commence | Dana Leavitt | First quality report cycle | |
Detailed action items for every person involved, organized by role and with target deadlines.
Every federal requirement that must be satisfied for CMS approval of the provider assessment and State Plan Amendment.
State-level procedural requirements from bill drafting through implementation.
Estimated costs for executing the full legislative campaign. Range reflects minimum viable effort through comprehensive approach.
| Line Item | Low Estimate | High Estimate |
|---|---|---|
|
Independent Economic Study Commission university or consulting firm to produce independent fiscal impact analysis. Critical for credibility with legislators and JFAC. |
$25,000 | $50,000 |
|
Medicaid Consulting Firm (UPL/SPA) Specialized Medicaid policy firm for Upper Payment Limit analysis, State Plan Amendment technical assistance, CMS preprint preparation, and federal compliance documentation. |
$30,000 | $60,000 |
|
Lobbying / Government Affairs (Supplemental) Supplemental lobbying support beyond IHCA staff capacity. May not be needed if IHCA staff (Luke, Lindsay) handle all legislative engagement. Contract lobbyist for vote whipping if needed. |
$0 | $50,000 |
|
Media / Public Relations Op-ed placement, press releases, media training, editorial board preparation, digital advocacy content, and media monitoring. |
$10,000 | $25,000 |
|
Grassroots Coordination Activation kit production and distribution, letter-writing campaign management, testimony preparation and witness coaching, advocacy day logistics. |
$5,000 | $10,000 |
|
Travel / Meetings CMS Region 10 meeting travel (Seattle), legislative session attendance, facility site visits by legislators, coalition meetings. |
$5,000 | $10,000 |
|
Printing / Materials Fact sheets, one-pagers, testimony binders, committee hearing packets, facility posters, constituent letter templates. |
$2,000 | $5,000 |
| Total Estimated Campaign Budget | $77,000 | $210,000 |
Top 10 risks to successful passage and implementation, with likelihood, impact, mitigation, and ownership.
| # | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation Strategy | Owner |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | "Tax increase" framing — opponents label provider assessment as a tax hike | High | High | Pre-emptive messaging: "Not a tax — it's an industry self-investment that generates $6 in federal funds for every $1 of state cost." Deploy independent economic study. Emphasize 45+ states already do this. Brief editorial boards early. Have bipartisan sponsors ready to rebut. | Robert, Luke |
| 2 | No viable bill sponsor — unable to secure committed lead sponsor by session | Low | High | Luke's former colleague relationships are primary asset. Start early (Sep). Target multiple candidates simultaneously. If House sponsor elusive, pivot to Senate. Engage Governor's office to suggest champions. Bipartisan approach broadens pool. | Luke Malek |
| 3 | Governor opposition or neutrality — Governor Little does not actively support | Medium | High | Owen's personal outreach to Governor's office (Sep). Riley + Robert advance briefing (Dec). Frame as fiscal responsibility — recovering federal funds Idaho already pays into. Highlight economic impact: jobs, facilities staying open. No general fund increase narrative. | Owen Hammond |
| 4 | Committee defeat — H&W Committee votes "hold" or "return to sponsor" | Medium | High | Pre-hearing vote counting (Lindsay). Grassroots pressure on committee members from their districts. Strong testimony package — real CNAs, families. Independent economic study as credibility anchor. Offer to address any committee concerns with amendments if needed. | Lindsay Likes |
| 5 | Industry opposition — subset of nursing facilities oppose increased assessment | Medium | Medium | Early education campaign through Dana's member communications. Show facility-by-facility net benefit analysis (Steve's models). Demonstrate that all facilities benefit from rate floor and federal draw. Address concerns through IHCA board process. Rate floor protects smallest operators. | Robert, Dana |
| 6 | CMS rejection of SPA — CMS declines to approve State Plan Amendment | Low | High | Pre-consultation with CMS Region 10 (Oct) specifically to identify any concerns before bill is drafted. Design assessment to be clearly within safe harbor. Engage experienced Medicaid consulting firm for SPA preparation. 45+ states have approved similar SPAs. | Luke Malek |
| 7 | Federal policy changes — Congress or CMS alters provider assessment rules or FMAP | Low | High | Monitor federal legislation actively. Build bill with flexibility provisions. Include effective date contingency language. Track CMS rulemaking through AHCA/NCAL federal advocacy. 5.5% rate provides 0.5% buffer below safe harbor. | Luke Malek |
| 8 | Hostile floor amendments — poison pill amendments during floor debate | Medium | Medium | Identify potential opposition amendments before floor vote. Prepare sponsor talking points for each scenario. If amendment is acceptable, negotiate pre-floor to avoid surprises. If hostile, mobilize bipartisan opposition to amendment. | Luke Malek, Lindsay |
| 9 | Weak grassroots turnout — insufficient constituent engagement | Medium | Medium | Early activation (Dec) using Dana's kit. Tim coordinates Cascadia facilities for baseline participation. Region Directors (Tiffany, Angie, Isaiah) own their territories. Track participation by facility — follow up with non-responsive. Use family stories — more compelling than industry data. | Dana Leavitt, Tim Nelson |
| 10 | Implementation delay — rulemaking or SPA process delays July 1 effective date | Medium | Low | Begin DHW engagement early (Sep 2026). Negotiate with DHW on parallel processing of SPA and rulemaking. Bill can authorize temporary rules for July 1 start. Build 90-day contingency buffer into implementation timeline. CMS typically processes SPAs in 90 days. | Robert, Luke |
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for each phase — how to measure progress and identify when corrective action is needed.
Key contacts for campaign execution — internal team and external stakeholders.